SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 646

High Court Of Calcutta
SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE,.
SUDIP MUKHERJEE - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
P. L. A.  163  Of  1991
Decided On : 09/23/2004

The legatees under a will are entitled to apply for grant of letters of administration under Section 232 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, where the executor of the will dies before proving the will.

Headnote:

PROBATE - GRANT OF LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION - ACT-SECTION REFERRED : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 232 - SUMMARY : Where the executor of a will dies before proving the will, the legatees under the will are entitled to apply for grant of letters of administration under Section 232 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

Fact of the Case:

An application for grant of probate of the alleged last Will and testament of Satidas Mukherjee, since deceased, was filed by the executor named and appointed in the said Will. Since a caveat was lodged, the proceeding became contentious. Unfortunately, before the Will could be proved, the executor died on September 15, 2002. The present application has been filed by one of the legatees under the will for leave to proceed with the said application upon conversion of this proceeding for grant of probate into a proceeding for grant of letters of administration.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the legatees under the Will are entitled to apply for grant of letters of administration under Section 232 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as there is no period of limitation governing such an application.

Issues: Whether the legatees under the Will are entitled to apply for grant of letters of administration under Section 232 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, where the executor of the will dies before proving the will.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court relied on the following precedents: - Shambhu Prasad Agarwal and Others v. Bhola ram Agarwal reported in 2000 (9) SCC 714 - Santi Swarup Sarkar v. Pradip Kumar Sarkar and Others reported in AIR 1997 Calcutta 197 - Haripada Saha and Another v. Gobinda Chandra saha and Others reported in 51 Calwn 917 - Jadeja Pravinsinhji Anandsinhji v. Jadeja Mangalsinhji Shivsinhjiand Others reported in AIR 1963 Gujarat 32 - Govind M. Asraniv. Jairamasrani and Another reported in AIR 1963 Madras 456 The Court held that an executor in applying for probate is not fighting a personal action but fighting for the interests of all the beneficiaries under the will. Therefore, the action of an executor in applying for a probate is not in substance a personal action and the maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona could not apply to such a case.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the application and permitted the applicant to proceed with this application upon conversion of the proceeding into a proceeding for grant of letters of administration.

( 1 ) AN application for grant of probate of the alleged last Will and testament of Satidas Mukherjee, since deceased, was filed by the executor named and appointed in the said Wilt.

( 2 ) SINCE a caveat was lodged, the proceeding became contentious.

( 3 ) UNFORTUNATELY, before the Will could be proved, the executor died on september 15, 2002.

( 4 ) THE present application has been filed by one of the legatees under the will for leave to proceed with the said application upon conversion of this proceeding for grant of probate into a proceeding for grant of letters of administration.

( 5 ) MR. Debasish Kundu, learned Advocate, appearing in support of the application, cites the case of Shambhu Prasad Agarwal and Others v. Bhola ram Agarwal reported in 2000 (9) SCC 714 and Santi Swarup Sarkar v. Pradip Kumar Sarkar and Others reported in AIR 1997 Calcutta 197.

( 6 ) MR. Saha, learned Advocate, appearing for the caveator, opposes this application.

( 7 ) IN the case of Haripada Saha and Another v. Gobinda Chandra saha and Others reported in 51 Calwn 917 the sole executrix under the Will of one Rampada Saha applied for grant of probate. Only six days after the said application was filed, the sole executrix died. Three persons made an application before the learned District Delegate, inter alia, praying for permission to continue the said proceeding in stead and in place of the sole executrix and they prayed for letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed. As objection was raised, the proceeding became contentious and the learned District Delegate returnd the application with a direction to the applicants to present the said application before the learned District Judge. The learned District Judge granted letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed to two of the petitioners inasmuch as one of the petitioners, in the meantime, abandoned him claim. The objectors appealed against the order granting letters of administration.

( 8 ) A Division Bench of this Court in the said case held "when in substance, the application for substitution was treated as one for letters of administration with a

copy of the Will annexed on the basis of the respondents' own rights to the property left by the testator as heirs of Subasini, it would, we think, be sacrificing justice to mere technicality, if we are to set aside the entire proceeding at the present stage, and direct the plaintiffs to proceed afresh. There is undoubtedly a technical defect, but it is not a defect which has in any way affected the merits of the case or the jurisdiction of the court. In substance the application of the plaintiffs contain all the particulars which are necessary for a proper petition for letters of administration with a copy of the Will annexed, as heirs of the heirs of the sole legatee and we think that we can ignore the defective portion of it, and treat it as one made by the plaintiffs in their own right. "

( 9 ) IN Santi Swarup Sarkar (supra) the application for grant of probate in respect of the Will of Charu Sila Sarkar, since deceased was set down as contentious cause. During the pendency of the said proceeding, the sole surviving executor died. The said Santi Swarup Sarkar filed two applications before the Court. The first application was for transposing him as the plaintiff in stead and in place of the deceased testator and to grant him leave to proceed with the proceeding for grant of letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed under Section 232 of the Indian Succession Act ; the second application was for amendment of the application for grant of probate into an application for letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed in place of the prayer for probate.

( 10 ) IT has been held that the learned trial Judge should have allowed the prayers made in the said applications. The learned Judge observed "if it is competent for a legatee to file fresh application for grant of Letter of administration in









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top