PRAVENDU NARAYAN SINHA
SHIPRA RAJ ROY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 2 ) MR. Sudipto Moitra, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submitted that offence under Section 406 of the. P. C. is not a continuing offence. Elements of Section 406 of the. P. C. starts from entrustment and in the FIR lodged by the informant/o. P. No. 2 it was only stated that during marriage complainant's father gave 41 bhories of gold ornaments and other things as per list and at the time of marriage the relatives of the complainant handed over those things to the accused person. Mr. Moitra submitted that this averment in the FIR does not attract elements of Section 406 of the. P. C. as it fails to establish proper entrustment. In the marriage beside
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.