PARTHA SAKHA DATTA
KEYA MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
MAGMA LEASING LIMITED – Respondent
( 2 ) IT was a case under section 138 of the N.. Act. The petitioner appeared before the learned Magistrate on 2. 6. 2003 and was released on bail and then on 31. 1. 2004 she was examined under section 251 Cr. PC. On 3. 7. 2004 as she was absent warrant of arrest was issued against her but on 20. 7. 2004 she surrendered before the learned Magistrate and was released on bail. Then recording of evidence was completed, a date was fixed for her examination under section 313 Cr. PC. 5. 5. 2005 was the date fixed for examination of the accused under section 313 Cr. PC but on that day she was absent by a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.