SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 282

SAILENDRA PRASAD TALUKDAR
PUNIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GOUR @ GOBINDA CHANDRA DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBASISH ROY, GOPAL CHANDRA GHOSH, MADHUSUDAN SUR

( 1 ) THE present application under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against the judgement and order dated 14-05-2004 passed by the learned Additional District Judge and Judge, 1st Fast Track Court, chandernagore, in Misc. Appeal No. 92 of 1995 thereby affirming the judgement and order dated 09-02-1985 passed by the learned 1st Court of munsif, Chandernagore, in Misc. Case No. 49 of 1989.

( 2 ) THE opposite parties as pre-emptors filed an application under section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 as against the present petitioner as opposite party No. 1 and one Gopa! Chandra Das (since deceased)', the predecessor of the proforma opposite parties herein. lt was claimed in the said application under Section 8 of the W. B. L. R. Act that the case plot being No. 1173 measuring 92 sataks originally belonged to Ashutosh Das and Dasorathi Das to the extent of 8 anna share each. Ashutosh Das died leaving 3 sons, namely, Santiram Das, Gopal Chandra das and Gour @ Gobinda Chandra Das. Among the heirs of Ashutosh Das and Dasorathi Das, there had been a partition of the case plot. The demarcated portion of the property was allotted in the manner is described in the petit


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top