SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 366

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, KISHORE KUMAR PRASAD
PIJUSH KANTI CHOWDHURY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.BANERJI, AMIT BANERJI, INDRAJIT MONDAL, Z.ISLAM

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Article 226/227 of the constitution of India is at the instance of an unsuccessful applicant before the west Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal and is directed against order dated 19th May, 2006 passed by the Tribunal thereby dismissing the application filed by the writ petitioner challenging the order of vesting under section 14t (3) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act in a writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India which had been transferred to the Tribunal after constitution of the same under the provisions of the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal Act.

( 2 ) BEING dissatisfied, the writ petitioner has come up with the present writ application under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) DR. Mondal, the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner has raised a pure question of law in support of this application.

( 4 ) ACCORDING to Dr. Mondal, a Division Bench of this Court in the case of paschim Banga Rajya Bhumijibi Sangha vs. State of West Bengal, reported in 1996 (2) CLJ 285 having specifically declared the provision contained in section 14v vis-a-vis th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top