SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 379

PRABUDDHA SANKAR BANERJEE
NIRMALA SAWOO – Appellant
Versus
PRADIP CHATTERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIRUDDHA CHATTERJEE, ASISH BAGCHI, Mritunjoy Goswami, Shib Sankar Das

( 1 ) THIS revisional application is one under Article 227 of the Constitution of india and is directed against order No. 7 dated 28. 03. 2005 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Junior Division, (being Additional Controller, sealdah) Sealdah in ejectment case No. 265 of 2004.

( 2 ) THE said suit was brought by the present Opposite Parties against the present petitioners for eviction of tenant from the property in question.

( 3 ) IN the said case the plaintiffs/petitioners filed one application under section 39 (6) of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 with prayer for temporary injunction against the Opposite Parties. In that application grounds were duly mentioned so that the Court can pass appropriate order on the basis of the said application.

( 4 ) THE present Opposite Parties contested the said application by filing written objection.

( 5 ) BY the order impugned, the learned Additional Rent Controller allowed the application and restrained the present petitioners from using the entrance door on the North excepting at the time of using the meter box if required that too with prior permission of the petitioners.

( 6 ) BEING aggrieved and dissatisfied with the






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top