SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 396

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, RUDRENDRA NATH BANERJEE
JAMUNA CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
SITAL CHAKRABORTY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Angshuman Chakraborty

( 1 ) THIS first miscellaneous appeal is at the instance of an unsuccessful applicant under order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed in a regular title appeal and is directed against Order No. 66 dated January 05, 2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Second Court at hooghly in Title Appeal No. 245 of 1993 thereby rejecting the said application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil procedure.

( 2 ) IN our view, the present first miscellaneous appeal is not maintainable. According to Order 43 Rule l (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, a first miscellaneous appeal lies against an order under Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 2a, 4 and 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The opening sentence of Order 39 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure starts with the phrase "where in any suit it is proved by affidavit or otherwise. . . . . . . . . . ". Therefore, Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code is applicable only to the suits. However, by virtue of the provisions contained in section 141 of the Code, the procedure provided in the Code of civil Procedure in regard to the suits should be followed as far it can be made applicable in all














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top