SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 407

P.N.SINHA
PARTHA PRATIM BASAK – Appellant
Versus
ARUNDHUTI BASAK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DALIA ROY, JIBAN RATAN CHATTERJI, KOUSHIK DEY, SUSMITA BISWAS

( 1 ) THIS revisional application is directed against the order dated 10. 4. 06 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (hereinafter called the ACJM), Barrackpore in connection with Case No. M/195 of 2005 thereby allowing the application under section 125 of the Cr. PC filed by the opposite party (in short the O. P.)/wife and granting her maintenance @ Rs. 1000/- per month for herself and @ Rs. 700/- per month for her minor son and directing the petitioner to pay maintenance from the date of filing of the application under section 125 of the Cr. PC.

( 2 ) MR. Jiban Ratan Chatterjee, the learned Advocate for the petitioner husband submitted that the petitioner does computer repairing job and his income is very meagre. On 18. 4. 05, the 0. P. /wife left the matrimonial home and went away to her father's house. Since then the O. P. did not come back to husband's house in spite of repe ted efforts made by the husband petitioner to take her back. The learned Magistrate who allowed the application under section 125 of Cr. PC did not appreciate the evidence and materials on record and failed to realise that the wife left matrimonial home on her own without any just and















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top