ARUN KUMAR BHATTACHARYA
LAKSHMI KANTA PAL – Appellant
Versus
DILIP KUMAR PAL – Respondent
( 2 ) THE circumstances leading to the above applications are that the petitioner obtained orders of pre-emption under Section 8 of the West bengal Land Reforms Act in respect of 'kha' Schedule property as a contiguous landowner against O. P. Nos. 1 and 2 (in C. O. No. 567/2007)and O. P. No. 1 (in C. O. No. 568/2007 ). The learned Court'of appeal below reversed the said orders holding on the basis of a decision of the apex Court that the law of pre-emption on the ground of vicinage is void as it infringes the fundamental right to hold, acquire or dispose of property guaranteed under Article 19 (1) (f) of the Constitution of India.
( 3 ) BEING aggrieved by the said orders, the pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.