( 1 ) AFTER hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and after going through the explanation given herein, we find that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal within the period of limitation. We, thus, condone the delay in preferring the appeal.

( 2 ) THE application for condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation act being CAN No. 5221 of 2007 is disposed of accordingly. Re: An application for stay being CAN No. 5222/2007.

( 3 ) INSTEAD of taking up the application for stay, we propose to hear out the appeal itself by treating it as on day's list.

( 4 ) BY this mandamus appeal an unsuccessful writ petitioner has challenged two orders, one dated 8th August, 2006 passed by a learned Single Judge thereby dismissing a writ application and the other dated 20th April, 2007 passed by his Lordship thereby refusing to recall the earlier order dated 8th August, 2006.

( 5 ) IN the writ application, the grievance of the writ petitioner was that he took loan from respondent No. 4 for the purpose of purchasing a truck and, accordingly, a hire purchase agreement was entered into between the writ petitioner and the respondent No. 4. Pursuant t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document