SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 672

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA
SK. ABUL KALAM – Appellant
Versus
UMAPADA MAITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.ADHIKARI, J.H.MULLICK, S.T.Mina, SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYA

( 1 ) THIS application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order being No. 47 dated 27th September, 2006 (Later)passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Wakf Tribunal, West Bengal, in suit No. 8 of 2004 by which the petitioners' prayer for amendment of plaint was rejected by the learned Tribunal.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs/petitioners filed a suit for declaration and injunction against the opposite parties in the learned Court of the Wakf Tribunal.

( 3 ) IN the said suit the plaintiffs/petitioners prayed for a declaration that various Deed of Conveyances executed by the defendant Nos. 10 to 18 in favour of Ram Krishna Jana, the predecessor of defendant Nos. 19 to 25 in respect of 'a' and 'b' schedule properties and the subsequent deed executed by the predecessor of the defendant Nos. 19 to 25, namely, raj Krishna Jana dated 23rd August, 1960 in favour of the defendant Nos. 1 to 4 and the predecessors of defendant Nos. 5 to 9, namely, Narayan chandra Jana, since deceased, are void ab-initio with a further declaration that the said deeds which were recorded in the relevant book and volume with the concerned registration office, stands cancelled.

( 4 ) A










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top