SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 119

PARITOSH KUMAR MUKHERJEE
GITA DEVI SHAH – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRA MONI KARNANI – Respondent


PARITOSH K. MUKHERJEE, J, J.


( 1 ) THESE two appeals are arising out of the judgment and order dated 31/03/1987, passed by the learned Assistant District judge, 2nd Court, Alipore in Title Suit No. 247 of 1981 and Title Suit No. 154 of 1983, which were heard analogously.

( 2 ) SMT. Gita Devi Shah and others, being the plaintiffs in Title Suit No. 247 of 1981, purchased the suit premises being 1/1 Rowland Road, Calcutta-20, from the defendant No. 2 in three equal and undivided 1/3 shares under registered deeds of Kobala dated 26/07/1978. After the said purchase of the suit premises, a letter was issued by the Advocate on behalf of the plaintiffs to the defendant No. 1, Smt. Chandra Moni Karnani, informing about the transfer of the suit premises. The said letter has been marked as Exhibit No. 2 in the suit. On the same day, a letter of attornment was also issued by the defendant No. 2 to defendant No. 1. It is claimed by the plaintiffs of Title Suit No. 247 of 1981 that the defendant No. 1 was tenant originally under defendant No. 2 and now under the plaintiffs in respect of five rooms on the ground floor, five rooms in the first floor with a servant quarters, garage and kitchen.

(
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top