ALTAMAS KABIR
ARATI PAL – Appellant
Versus
NIRMAL KUMAR TEKRIWAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two matters are taken up for disposal together as they involve common questions of law and fact which are. more or less similar.
( 2 ) IN both these two matters, notices issued by the Howrah Municipal Corporation under section 177 (1) of the Howrah Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, have been challenged as being ultra vires, on the ground that it vests certain powers in the Commissioner without laying down any guidelines for exercise of such powers, giving scope for arbitrary exercise of such powers in identical cases.
( 3 ) APPEARING in support of the writ application filed by Smt. Atari Pal, Mr. Mukul Prokesh Banerjee, learned advocate, firstly submitted that is the absence of any guidelines, the powers vested in the Commissioner under subsection (1) of section 177 of the aforesaid Act gave him the absolute and unfettered discretion to take recourse to any of the measures provided for therein. Mr. Banerjee pointed out that under the aforesaid provisions, the Commissioner could is identical circumstances either make an order directing that a construction be stopped or demolished or such addition or alteration therein be made as considered necessary. Mr. B
S.G.Jaisinghani v. Union of India and Ors.
Devi Das Gopal Krishnan v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress and Ors.
Purusottam Lalji v. Ratanlal Agarwal
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.