SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE
MAHENDRA KANJI SICKA – Appellant
Versus
PRADIP KUMAR GHOSH – Respondent
( 2 ) BOTH the Courts below concurrently rejected an application filed by the defendant No 6/petitioner under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil procedure praying for rejection of the plaint.
( 3 ) FOLLOWING facts are relevant to deal with this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India: (a) Admittedly. Asit Kumar Ghosh, since deceased, was the original landlord of 23a, Asutosh Chowdhury Avenue, previously known as 23a,old baliygunge Road, Kolkata. (b) Asit Kumar Ghosh inducted Moolji Sicca and Company, a partnership firm, as a tenant at a monthly rental of Rs. 1001/- payable according to English calendar. (c) Asit Kumar Ghosh instituted Title Suit No. 54 of 1972 in the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge, Second Court at Alipore on July 31, 1972 against th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.