SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 228

KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
MANOHAR KUMAR KANKARIA – Appellant
Versus
SK. MD. SHAWKAT – Respondent


( 1 ) ALL the aforesaid three applications have been taken out by the respective applicants viz. Banshi Badan Dalai (G. A. No. 934 of 2006) and Bansi and Hari Sankar (G. A. No. 935 of 2006} carrying on business under the name and style of "studio Fine arts", Ranjit Bose of Rup Chakra (G. A. No. 933 of 2006 ). The applicants have come with these three applications to resist the execution of the decree passed in the aforesaid suit, for delivery of possession of the suit premises. These three persons are not the parties to the suit. The plaintiff decree holder obtained the decree in a suit for eviction against the aforesaid defendants on the application under Chapter XIIIA taken out by the plaintiff/petitioner. The said application under Chapter XIIIA was contested by one of the defendants and his contest failed. Thereafter the decree has been put into execution. The Receiver was appointed in and over the decreetal property for effective execution of the decree. In terms of the Court's order the Receiver put up a notice for vacating all the occupants within a certain time. The Court also allowed the respective occupant or occupants to come to this Court and to establish their right to















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top