SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 500

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY
CLS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIMALENDU DAS, DIPANKAR DUTTA, SAPTANGSU BASU

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein has challenged the panel prepared by the Dealer selection Committee for appointment of Retail Outlet Dealer of Bharat Petroleum corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as BPCL) at or around Chanditala in Hooghly District.

( 2 ) THE said petitioner has raised various objections in respect of awarding of the marks on the basis whereof the impugned panel was prepared by the respondent Dealer Selection Committee. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the guidelines issued by BPCL for allotment of marks in respect of different categories have not been properly followed.

( 3 ) MR. Saptangsu Basu, learned Advocate of the petitioner submits that the said petitioner duly submitted the prescribed application form together with all relevant documents as required in terms of the guidelines framed by the respondent authorities herein. The said learned Advocate of the petitioner further submits that the originals of all the documents annexed with the prescribed application form were also produced before the Selection Committee at the time of interview. Mr. Basu also submits that no genuine ground was disclosed by the respondents to explain why




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top