PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY
CLS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE said petitioner has raised various objections in respect of awarding of the marks on the basis whereof the impugned panel was prepared by the respondent Dealer Selection Committee. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the guidelines issued by BPCL for allotment of marks in respect of different categories have not been properly followed.
( 3 ) MR. Saptangsu Basu, learned Advocate of the petitioner submits that the said petitioner duly submitted the prescribed application form together with all relevant documents as required in terms of the guidelines framed by the respondent authorities herein. The said learned Advocate of the petitioner further submits that the originals of all the documents annexed with the prescribed application form were also produced before the Selection Committee at the time of interview. Mr. Basu also submits that no genuine ground was disclosed by the respondents to explain why
REFERRED TO : Bharat Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.