SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 493

PATHERYA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
ANJALI METIA – Appellant
Versus
WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANOTOSH CHAKRAVARTY, PANKAJ HAIDER, S.S.KOLEY, SAYANDEV SENGUPTA, SUBHAS CHANDRA BANERJEE, Sumit Roy

V. S. SIRPURKAR, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is against an order by the learned single Judge who, while disposing of the writ petition directed the West bengal State Electricity Board to supply the electricity at the portion of the premises under the occupation of the petitioner. The petitioner had come up before this Court on the ground that though he had applied for the electric connection in respect of the house which he had occupied, he was not being granted that connection by the Board.

( 2 ) THE learned Judge has simply directed the Board to supply the connection and has made further observation that the supply of electricity to the petitioner would not create any right in favour of the petitioner nor would it be to the prejudice and interest of the private respondents. It is to be seen that hi this writ petition, the petitioner's mother and two married sisters are joined as respondents because they had raised an objection to the grant of electricity connection.

( 3 ) THE petitioner is the son of one Aditya Ranjan Biswas. He has one brother and two married sisters, viz. , Bijoli Manna and Anjali Metia. His mother Atashi Rani Biswas is still living. What transpires from the affid







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top