SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 534

ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE, TAPAN MUKHERJEE
TURNER MORRISON AND CO. LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


( 1 ) THE Court : Since both these appeals involve identical question of law these are disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) IN terms of section 188 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to the said Act of 1980) objections with regard to enhancement of valuation is to be disposed of by the Hearing Officer in the manner prescribed in the said section. Section 189 provides for appeal to be preferred against the decision of the Hearing Officer within 45 days from the date of service of a copy of the order passed by the Hearing Officer under section 188. Under Rule 9 of the Taxation Rules framed under the said Act of 1980 the order was to be communicated to the objector in Form h. Form H prescribes communicatibn of the said order in the said format. The words "copy of order" are also stipulated in Form H. However, the communication under Rule 9 (2) which is commonly known as red card only specifies the enhanced or reduced valuation which is communicated to the objector and the objector, if aggrieved by such valuation, is to file an appeal before the Tribunal within 45 days from the date of receipt of the red card. In both these matters the writ peti






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top