SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 515

ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE
PRABIR KUMAR DAS – Appellant
Versus
JAYANTI DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.KAR, UTPAL BHATTACHARYA

( 1 ) ONE Nirmal Kumar Das died leaving him surviving the parties abovenamed by making a Will. The widow, younger son and daughter being the respondents abovenamed applied lor letters of administration in this Court with a copy of the will annexed. The elder son, the applicant abovenamed, lodged caveat.

( 2 ) THE present application was filed by the elder son for dismissal of the application for letters pf administration being P. L. A. No. 355 of 2001 on the ground that this Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the said application. The application for letters of administration was filed by invoking the jurisdiction of this Court on the ground that the deceased had his permanent place of abode at 25/5a, Anathdeb Lane, Calcutta outside the jurisdiction of this hon'ble Court as well as the City Civil Court, Calcutta. The place of abode was within the territorial jurisdiction of District Judge, 24-Parganas (North ). The deceased, however, left immovable property at Sitaram Ghosh Street, Calcutta within the jurisdiction if this Hon'ble Court as well as City Civil Court at Calcutta.

( 3 ) THE applicant contended that the provision of Clause 34 of the Letters patent of th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top