SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 768

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, PRABUDDHA SANKAR BANERJEE
MAPLE TECHNOLOGIES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMITAVA MUKHERJEE, Biswadeb Roy Choudhury, MUN MUN DUBEY, SANJAY CHAKRABORTY, SOURAV CHOWDHURY

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS mandamus appeal is at the instance of a writ petitioner and is directed against the order passed by the learned Single judge by which His Lordship refused t;o entertain the writ application filed by the appellant on the ground that the appropriate remedy of the appellant lay before the Civil Court.

( 2 ) THE appellant before us became the lowest bidder in a tender issued by the University of Animal and Fishery Sciences for supply of the computers and other necessary appliancces and consequently, supplied the required number of the computers and other items. According to the appellant, in spite of supply of the goods, the University authority refused to make payment of the goods supplied wthout disclosing any reason.

( 3 ) BEING dissatisfied, the writ petitioner has come up with the present mandamus appeal.

( 4 ) MR. Mukherjee, the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant, strenuously contended before us that the learned Single Judge refused to exercise jurisdiction vested in His Lordship by holding that the appropriate remedy of the appellant lay before the Civil Court. According to Mr. Mukherjee, in this case, there was no dispu

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top