SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 121

PRATAP KUMAR RAY
GOUTAM DAS – Appellant
Versus
NIRBHOY CHANDRA CHOWDHURY – Respondent


Pratap Kumar Ray

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

( 2 ) THIS application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed on assailing the order dated 16th September, 2005 passed by learned Civil judge (Junior Division), Jalpaiguri in Misc. (Pre-emption) Case No. 34 of 2004 whereby and whereunder application praying injunction to restrain the respondents from executing any sale deed was refused. This pre-emption application was filed by the petitioner admittedly at the pre-matured stage, namely, when the registration of the document was not at all completed in terms of Section 61 of the Registration Act, which provides that registration would be completed on fulfillment of all the formalities in terms of the said Act. Reliance may be placed to the judgment passed in the case Ram Saran Lall and ors. v. Mst. Domini Kuer and Ors. , reported in AIR 1961 SC 1747 and Hiralal aggarwal v. Rampadarath Singh, reported in AIR 1969 SC 244,

( 3 ) RIGHT of pre-emption is a statutory right granted under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, which, however, provides a statutory condition that right of pre-emption in respect of any holding now after the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top