SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 421

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, RUDRENDRA NATH BANERJEE
SHRIMATI SHILA ROY CHOUDHURY – Appellant
Versus
NIMAI CHARAN RAKSHIT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HARISH TANDON, PRABAL MUKHERJI, Rajat Dutta

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appea' is arising out of a suit, inter alia, for recovery of khas'possession on the expiry of lease and for recovery of mesne profits.

( 2 ) THE predecessor-in-interest of the defendants, namely, Ranen roychowdhury, was inducted as a lessee by Gunindra Mohan Bose, under a registered deed of lease dated October 1, 1964 for a period of 21 years commencing from August 1, 1964. On the death of Gunindra Mohan Bose, the property devolved upon his son, Amal Kumar Bose, who by executing a registered deed of conveyance dated August 13, 1984 conveyed the property in favour of the plaintiff. By such purchase the plaintiff stepped into the shoes of the lessor. The lessee accepted the plaintiff as his landlord and paid the rents to the plaintiff.

( 3 ) THE lease expired on August 1, 1985 by efflux of time. The plaintiff, under mistaken impression, received rent from the lessee for the month of august 1985 and granted receipt therefor. However, when such mistake was detected, the plaintiff sent back the rent for the month of August 1985 to the lessee by money order, but the lessee refused to accept the said money order.

( 4 ) THE plaintiff instituted thi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top