SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 328

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, P.N.SINHA
PUSHPA CHAND – Appellant
Versus
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK DAS ADHIKARY, S.N.DUTTA, SANDIP DEV, SUTAPA SANYAL

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, P. N. Sinha, JJ.

( 1 ) INSTEAD of disposing of the application for stay being C. A. N. No. 2725 of 2006, we propose to hear out the appeal itself by treating the same as on day's list with the consent of the parties.

( 2 ) THIS first miscellaneous appeal is at the instance of the plaintiffs in a suit for declaration and injunction and is directed against Order No. 52 dated february 13, 2006 passed by the learned Trial Judge thereby rejecting the plaint.

( 3 ) THE present appellants filed a suit before the City Civil Court at Calcutta being Title Suit No. 1605 of 1997 thereby praying for declaration that the defendants were entitled to realize the arrear taxes from the plaintiffs on the basis of consolidated rate bills of premises No. 76c, Acharyya Jagadish Chandra bose Road, Calcutta, but the defendants were not entitled to realize arrear consolidated rate of taxes without the consolidated rate bills from the plaintiff's in respect of the premises and for permanent injunction restraining the opposite parties from taking any other recourses by issuing notice of distress warrant for realizing all arrear consolidated rate of taxes in respect of the said premise

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top