SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 377

PRAVENDU NARAYAN SINHA, BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
RATNA BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRA MADHAB BANERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bidyut Kumar Banerjee, DEBABRATA CHAKRABORTY, Hari Naraya

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA. J.

( 1 ) THISFIRST appeal is at the instance of a wife in a suit for divorce filed by the husband and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 8th December, 1994 passed by the additional District Judge, 11th Court, alipore in Matrimonial Suit No. 12 of 1993 thereby passing a decree for divorce on the ground of cruelty.

( 2 ) THE husband filed an application for divorce under Section 27 (i) (d) of the Special marriage Act thereby praying for divorce on the sole ground of cruelty and the case made out by the respondent may be precised thus:

(a) The parties were married according to the Special Marriage Act and subsequently, a social marriage was solemnised on 21st february, 1985 at 8, Ram Mohan Roy Road, calcutta-700 009, the ancestral house of the husband.

(b) The husband was initially an employee of the United Industrial Bank but the said bank having been merged with the allahabad Bank, at the time of institution of the proceedings the husband was an employee of the Allahabad Bank. The wife, prior to her marriage, was an instructress in a physical training Institute and the marriage was an outcome of love affairs between the parties

.

(c) The parties


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top