SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 147

PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA, TAPEN SEN
JUTHIKA BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH MUKHERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASOKE BANERJI, JAHAR LAL ROY, P.K.PAHARI, P.R.MITRA

PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS probate appeal is by the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased-defendant No. 1 and against the grant of probate in respect of a holograph Will written in English executed by the testator Narendranath Banerjee on 9th October, 1982.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for the present purpose are that the testator executed the said Will while he was aged more or less 97 years. He died on 11th October, 1984 i. e after 2 years of his execution of the said holograph Will. The plaintiff-respondent was appointed as the executor to the said Will who propounded the Will for the grant of probate

( 3 ) ADMITTEDLY the testator died leaving behind him two sons and four married daughters who were all cited in the probate proceeding. One of the sons of the testator, the defendant No 1, contested the grant while one of the married daughters namely Gita Mukherjee supported the case of the plaintiff, the propounder All other defendants did not contest the proceeding.

( 4 ) THE propounder is the husband of one Sm Arati Mukherjee The testator by the said Will has made a bequest of the flat of premises No. 38/1 -B, gariahat Road, Calcutta situated at North West in t






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top