SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 190

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, P.N.SINHA
JITENDRA NATH CHALKI – Appellant
Versus
BIMAL KRISHNA KUNDU CHQWDHURY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HIRANMOY BHATTACHARYA, NABA KUMAR DAS, SAMIRAN GIRI

P. N. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS first appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Judge, Land Acquisition Tribunal, Additional district Judge, 1st Court, Howrah in L. A. Case No. 19 of 1968 thereby allowing the L. A. Misc. Case No. 19 of 1968 filed by respondent No. 1. Being aggrieved by, and dissatisfied with, the judgment and decree passed by the learned L. A. Judge the O. P. No. 1 as appellant has preferred the instant appeal.

( 2 ) THE reference case arose out of an application under section 18 of the land Acquisition Act (hereinafter called L. A. Act), 1894 filed by the plaintiff respondent alleging that the petitioners and their co-sharers are entitled to receive compensation in respect of plot No. 2052 of Mouza Duillya known as duilya Garden South Paddy Land within P. S. Sankrail, and for declaration that compensation has been wrongly awarded in favour of the defendant appellant. It was also alleged in the said reference petition that defendant appellant Jiten Chalki had never any right, title and interest in the said plot no. 2052. In the petition of reference, the valuation made by the L. A. Collector was challenged and the petitioners laid claim

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top