SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 177

SEN GUPTA
NUMAZAR DORAB MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
THEASSAM COMPANY LTD. – Respondent


SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs have taken out this application to withdraw the instant suit. In prayer (a) leave is sought for to withdraw the suit simplicitor on such terms as the hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.

( 2 ) MR. Mitra, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicants upon instruction submits that his clients are pressing for the relief in terms of prayer (c), namely, leave be given under Order 23, Rule 1 of the code of Civil Procedure to withdraw the instant suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit in respect of the subject matter of the instant suit, therefore, the issue in this application shall be confined to the provision of Order 23, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Mr. Mitra on merits submits that on the advice of the legal expert the present suit cannot be maintained in its form. The instant suit has been filed for eviction of the defendant on the ground of the expiry of lease in respect of the premises in question by efflux of time. An application for summary judgment was taken out and in that application a defence was taken that the suit filed by the plaintiffs cannot be governed by the Transfer of Property Act and the defendant enjoys t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top