SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 275

PRAVENDU NARAYAN SINHA, BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
BINNY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ALLIANCE PROPERTIES AND INDUSTRIES LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOKE GHOSH, HARISH TANDON, S.P.ROYCHOWDHURY, U.S.MENON

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS first appeal is at the instance of a plaintiff in a suit for declaration that it is a tenant governed under the provisions of the West bengal Premises Tenancy Act and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff and in any way affecting the right of the plaintiff as a premises tenant and this appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 13th June, 1995 passed by the learned trial Judge thereby dismissing the suit

( 2 ) THE following facts are not in dispute1 ). The plaintiff was put into possession of the suit property as a tenant on 1 st October, 1965 and long thereafter, on 25th October, 1967 a registered deed of lease was executed between the parties by which the plaintiff was recognised as a lessee for ten years with effect from 1st October, 1965, the date of initial induction It was specifically provided in the said deed of lease that the lease would come to an end with the expiry of 30th September, 1975 with a clause of renewal at the instance of the lessee2 ). In spite of expiry of the said lease, the plaintiff continued in possession and subsequently, on 13th Septem















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top