SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 321

KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
RAJENDRA SINGH LODHA – Appellant
Versus
AJOY KUMAR NEWAR – Respondent


Before: Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.

( 1 ) THE Court: First mentioned application being G. A. No. 4375 of 2004 has been taken out by one Radha Debi Mohatta being the defendant no. 2 while application being G. A. No. 4376 of 2004 was originally taken out by one Laxmi Debi Newar since deceased being the original defendant No. l. On her death inteastacy, one Ajoy Kumar Newar, one arabinda Kumar Newar, one Nanda Gopal Khaitan and one Debendra kumar Mahatri Defendant No. l (a), Defendant No. l (b ). Defendant No. l (c) and Defendant No. l (d) respectively were substituted in her place and stead. These two applications have been taken out by the aforesaid defendants for identical reliefs for-appointment of an Administrator and/ or a Committee headed by an independent and impartial Administrator to take over all movable and immovable assets and properties of the deceased, Smt, Priyamibada Debi Birla including the voting rights and the right of control of the deceased in respect of the companies specified in schedule being annexure 'j' to the petition; Administrator and/or committee to be appointed herein to take over the management affairs and control of the M. P. Birla Group of Companies s
































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top