SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 686

ALOK KUMAR BASU, TAPAS KUMAR GIRI
SK. RAHIM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


ALOK KUMAR BASU, J.

( 1 ) THE learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Additional Court, hooghly while (disposing of Sessions Trial Case No. 3 of 2003 convicted sk. Ruhim, Sk, Murshed Ali and Kaji Abdul Hassan under Sections 341,326 and 307 of the I. P. C. and all of them were sentenced to suffer imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 341 of the I. P. C. , rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence under Section 326 of the i. P. C. and rigorous imprisonment for ten years for the offence under Section 307 of the I. P. C. The learned Judge also directed for payment of rs. 75,000/- by each of the convicted person as compensation to cover the cost of treatment of the victim girl and also for her future maintenance in default all the victims were directed to suffer simple imprisonment for one year each under Section 357 of the Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) SK. Rahim and Sk. Murshed Ali challenging the above order of conviction and sentence have preferred Criminal Appeal No. 611 of 2003 while Kaji Abdul Hassan has preferred Criminal Appeal No. 612 of 2003 and both the appeals have been taken up together for disposal.

( 3 ) IT is pertinent to mention that while disposing of bai



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top