SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 722

SADHAN KUMAR GUPTA
PRASANTA KUMAR BASU – Appellant
Versus
NARANDRA KUMAR ANCHALIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT BHATTACHARYA, AYAN BHATTACHARYYA, INDRAJIT ADHIKARI, SOUVIK MITTER, TAPANDEB NANDI

Before Sadhan Kumar Gupta, J.

( 1 ) THIS criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by the learned City Sessions Judge, 8th Bench, Calcutta in Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 1999 whereby he acquitted the accused for the offence under Section 138 of the N. I. Act.

( 2 ) THE case of the appellant is that he is the Manager of the firm M/s. L. M. Enterprises and being duly empowered and authorized by the proprietor of the said firm, he filed a petition of complaint under Section 138 of the N. I. Act against the accused/respondent in the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, calcutta. Said case was registered as case No. C/1815/95.

( 3 ) IT was alleged in the said complaint, by the complainant that the accused/respondent as the proprietor of M/s. Sree Ramdevji Art International, in discharge of his existing liabilities issued two account payee cheques of Rs. 5,00,000/- each drawn on Indian Overseas Bank, Chowranghee Branch in favour of the appellant company. But those cheques were dishonoured and returned back to the appellant company. A notice was sent to the accused demanding payment of the amount as mentioned in those two cheques within 15 days from the receip






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top