SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 564

KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA, SANJIB BANERJEE
MALATI ROY CHOWDHURY – Appellant
Versus
SUDHINDRANATH MAJUMDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIMESH KANTI GHOSAL, DEBASISH ROY, G.MUKHERJEE

K. J. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) BY this appeal the appellant Malati has assailed the judgment and order of the learned trial Judge whereby and whereunder appellant's application for grant of letters of administration as well as that of one Basanti Bagchi since deceased, under Section 278 of the Indian succession Act, 1925 have been dismissed. During pendency of the application of basanti she died and in her place and stead one Jayanti Sanyal was substituted. The said Jayanti Sanyal's heirs and legal representatives, did not prefer any appeal against this judgment. As such, the question in this appeal is as to whether the learned trial judge has dismissed the application of the appellant rightly or wrongly.

( 2 ) THE case before he learned trial Judge made out by the appellant in her separate application was that she was an adopted daughter of one Tripti Roy Chowdhury, since deceased. On the death of Tripti. as her adopted daughter, Malati had become the sole heiress and legal representative of all her estate and effects. The said Basanti was the sister of Tripti Roy Chowdhury's husband, bimalakanta Roy Chowdhury who predeceased her. The said Roy Chowdhury couple was issueless and at the
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top