SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 636

SAILENDRA PRASAD TALUKDAR
BISHNU CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBABRATA ROY, JOYMALYA BAGCHI, PUSHPAL SATPATI

Before Sailendra Prasad Talukdar, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners by filing the instant application under Section 401/482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure sought for quashing of the impugned proceedings as well as for setting aside the impugned order dated 17th May, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, 24 Parganas (North) in G. R. Case No. 258 of 2006.

( 2 ) IT relates to Bizpure P. S. Case No. 18 of 2006 dated 19th January, 2006 under Section 306/120b/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 3 ) THE backdrop of the present case may briefly be stated as follows : -

One Sovana Routh filed an application under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the learned Court of Additional Chief Judicial magistrate, Barrackpore on 3rd January, 2006 against the present petitioners. She alleged that she is a widow. Her son, Keshab Routh, constructed his own house and was residing there with his family situated at Sharat Villa Gali, kanchrapara Police Station, Bizpur. On 22nd November, 2005 the son of the complainant met her mother and told her that he was going to his house to meet the intending buyers of his house and at about 3. 30 p. m. he left fo






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top