SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 621

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA
LUTFA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.

( 1 ) TWO members of No. 5 Bangalbari Gram Panchayat who did not participate in the requisitioned meeting held for removal of the Pradhan, have filed this writ petition, challenging the propriety of the order passed by the prescribed authority on 24th August, 2006, whereby the members of the said Gram Panchayat were requested to take necessary action as per act and rules as the resolution which was adopted in the meeting held on 21st August, 2006 was not approved as the notice of the requisition meeting was not served upon all the members as per Rule 6 (1) of the West Bengal panchayat (Gram Panchayat Administration) Rules, 2004.

( 2 ) THE legality and/or validity of the subsequent notice by which ten members of the said Gram Panchayat requisitioned a meeting for the very same purpose to be held on 5th September, 2006, has also been challenged in this writ petition.

( 3 ) LET me give the short background of this case which is necessary for appreciation of the dispute involved in this writ petition.

( 4 ) TEN members out of 19, by their notice dated 7th August, 2006 requested the Pradhan of the said Gram Panchayat to convene a requisition meeting for tr





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top