SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 641

ARUN KUMAR MITRA, KISHORE KUMAR PRASAD
COAL INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ETHELBARI TEA COMPANY (1932) LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOK BANERJEE, SUDHANSU SIL

KISHORE KUMAR PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the Order No. 24 dated 31 May 1986 passed by Shri A K. Dutta, learned Judge 9th Bench, City civil Court, Calcutta, in Misc. Case No. 874 of 1985. By the aforesaid impugned order, the learned trial Judge had rejected the application under order 9 Rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code filed on behalf of the defendant/appellant herein.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff/respondent filed a money suit being No. 732 of 1983 against the defendant/appellant on 16. 9. 1983 for recovery of price of coal paid in advance together with interest The learned Court below issued summons for appearance of the defendant/appellant on 24. 2. 1984 under order 5 Rule 19a of the Civil Procedure Code. The summons issued in the ordinary manner was not received back on 24. 2. 1984 but on this date, summons sent through registered post with A. D. to defendant/appellant was received back after service but the defendant/appellant did not appear. Hence the learned Trial Court fixed 28 2. 1984 for ex parte hearing of the suit. The ex parte hearing of the suit was adjourned on several days that is on 24. 4. 84, 12. 6. 84, 23. 7. 84, 12. 9. 84, 4. 12. 84 , 1. 2. 85, 2











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top