SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 252

ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE
BATLIBOI LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N.Sharma, D.S.MISHRA, Hiranmoy Dutt, PRATAP CHATTERJI, S.BAGCHI, T.Bose

ASKHM KUMAR BANBRJEE, J.

( 1 ) PARTIES entered into two contracts for supply of two sets of machines for production of arms by the ordnance factory of the Onion of India. The first contract stipulated supply of five machines and the second one was for supply of 11 machines. The contracts stipulated a particular period within which delivery was to be made in both cases. There had been admitted delay in supply. The contracts also stipulated payment of exercise duty as well as Sales Tax by the purchaser 'at the time of delivery'. It also stipulated payment of liquidated damages to the extent of 5 per cent on the outer limit on account of delay in supply.

( 2 ) THE supplier could not supply within the stipulated period in either of the cases. They prayed for extension of time which was granted by the Union of India. Union of India, however, had put conditions to the extent that they would be entitled to recover damages in terms of the contract. For such delay they would also be not liable to pay any additional duty towards the sales tax or exercise. After supplies were made, claimant raised their bills. Union of India paid them in both the cases as well as deducting the additional du























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top