SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 557

SOUMITRA SEN
JAI KRISHNA ARORA – Appellant
Versus
MAULVI ABDUR RAB FIROZE AHMED AND CO. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PRATAP CHATTERJI, SABYASACHI CHOWDHURY, Sourav Mohitra, TAPAN SIL

SOUMITRA SEN, J.

( 1 ) BY this order the above two applications are being disposed of. G. A. No. 2590 of 2003 has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff, inter alia, praying for the following reliefs:"a) Sheriff of Calcutta be directed to put the plaintiff in possession of the entire 1st and 2nd floor of the said premises No. 86, Purushottam Roy street, Calcutta by removing the defendant and any other person found therein in terms of the order dated 11th May, 1976; b) The Officer-in-Charge, Burrabazar Police Station be directed to depute sufficient number of police personnel at the premises No. 86, purushottam Roy Street, Calcutta and to break open the lock of any room if any for the purpose of execution of the decree in terms of the order dated 11th May, 1976; c) Suitable direction be given to the Officer-in-Charge, Burrabazar Police station to depute adequate number of police personnel at premises no. 86, Purushottam Roy Street, Calcutta to render all kinds of assistance for recovery of possession of the said premises as well as for maintaining peace in the locality for such period as to this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper; d) Such further and other orders be passed to put






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top