SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 553

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA, ARUN KUMAR BHATTACHARYA
NOYEL BARLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JAYANTA NARAYAN CHATTERJI, Swapan Kr. Maulik

D. P. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE present appeal was preferred against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 29. 11. 99 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Alipurduar in Sessions Trial no. 18/1998 (Sessions Case No. 4/98) thereby convicting the accused appellant under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default to suffer R. I. for a further period of 6 months.

( 2 ) PROSECUTION case, in short, was that on 19. 4. 96 at about 8. 30 P. M. when the victim Juhuri Barla was engaged in cooking food in the courtyard, her son and daughter, namely Anil Barla and Santi Barla were sitting by her side and were assisting their mother. Accused Noyel barla, husband of the victim, was in his room. Suddenly accused Noyel barla came out of his room with a 'jhurni' in his hand, struck victim juhuri on her neck and fled away. Victim Juhuri Barla fell down on the Courtyard and died instantly. PW 6 Sunil Barla, son of the victim thereafter lodged an information with Jaigaon Police Station and a case was registered under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code against accused Noyel Barla. On c


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top