SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 130

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA
ANIL KUMAR DEY – Appellant
Versus
BIDHU BHUSAN DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARIJIT CHATTERJEE, M.L.CHATTERJI, SOMNATH ROY CHOWDHURY, SUBRATA ROY KARMAKAR

J. BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) AN order dated 12th April 2002 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 3rd Court at Howrah in miscellaneous Appeal No. 296 of 1998 affirming the order dated 4 september 1998 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court at Howrah in Title Suit No. 3 of 1997, is under challenge in this revisional application.

( 2 ) THE petitioner herein is the plaintiff in a suit for declaration of his tenancy right in respect of the suit property and for permanent injunction.

( 3 ) AFTER filing the said suit, the petitioner filed an application under order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil procedure, inter alia, praying for an order of temporary injunction for restraining the defendant/opposite party No. 1 and his men, agents from interfering and/or disturbing the peaceful possession of the plaintiff in respect of the suit property.

( 4 ) THE learned trial Judge by his order being Order No. 2 dated 10th January 1997 was pleased to pass ad-interim order of injunction on the said application and thereby restrained the defendant No. 1 from disturbing the peaceful possession of the plaintiff in respect of the suit pre














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top