SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 117

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, RAJENDRA NATH SINHA
KALIDAS SADHU – Appellant
Versus
SUSHIL KUMAR AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMITABHA DAS GUPTA, HARISH TANDON, Sandeep Kumar Tewari

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS first miscellaneous appeal is at the instance of a defendant in a suit for declaration and permanent injunction and is directed against Order No. 17 dated June 1, 2004 passed by the learned judge, Second Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta, in Title Suit No. 1150 of 2003 thereby disposing of an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure filed by the plaintiff by directing the parties to maintain status quo as on that day in respect of the suit property till the disposal of the suit.

( 2 ) THE respondent filed the aforesaid suit being Title Suit No. 1150 of 2003 thereby praying for declaration that the letter dated 19th May, 2003 issued by the appellant had no force in the eye of law and not binding on the parties and for permanent injunction restraining the appellant, his men and agents and servants from encumbering the premises No. 243n, Acharya Prafulla Chandra road, P. S. Burtolla and from parting with possession or inducting any person and also from entering into any agreement with any third party in respect of construction and development of the said premises.

( 3 ) IN connection with the aforesaid suit, the respo















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top