ALTAMAS KABIR, ASIT KUMAR BISI
STATE OF UKRAINE – Appellant
Versus
MD. SHAFIQUE KHAN – Respondent
( 1 ) WHILE considering the application for stay, on consent of the parties, the appeal itself was taken up for hearing since the issue raised in the appeal involved a point of law which was capable of being decided on the materials already on record.
( 2 ) THE appellant in the instant appeal is the State of Ukraine and claims to be the owner of a vessel by the name of "m. V. Toyvo Antikaynen" registered at odessa in the State of Ukraine. According to the case as made out, the said vessel is registered in the name of the Black Sea Shipping Company which was at all material times the operating agent of the vessel and is an instrumentality of the State of Ukraine. The said vessel arrived at the Port of Calcutta on 5th may, 1997, for discharging cargo and was berthed at Khidirpur Docks in calcutta. At the relevant point of time the appellant had entered into a time charter with one Asia Express Shipping Agency and the said charter was subsisting when the vessel was berthed at Calcutta. The Diamond Shipping company is the agent of the Asia Express Shipping Agency. While the ship was berthed in Calcutta Dock some time in the middle of 1997, three business organ
REFERRED TO : M.V.Elisabeth and Ors. vs. Harwan Investment and Trading Private Ltd. (Goa)
Mirza All Akbar Kashani vs. United Arab Republic
Peoples Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India
Philipine Admiral (owners) and Wallem Shipping (Hong Kong Ltd.)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.