SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 2

AMITAVA LALA
JHONSON AND JHONSON LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THIRD INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARIJIT BANERJI, D.K.Pal, K.H.Dasan, MALA CHAKRAVARTY, P.S.SENGUPTA

AMITAVA LALA, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition award of the learned Judge, Third industrial Tribunal, West Bengal dated 29th August, 2003 has been challenged by the employer. Such award was published by an office order of the Deputy secretary, Government of West Bengal dated 10th September, 2003. The issues before the Tribunal were as follows : (1) Whether the termination of service of Shri Subir Guhathakurta w. e. f. 19. 09. 96 is justified? (2) To what relief, if any, is he entitled?

( 2 ) FROM the penultimate paragraph of the judgment in support of the award i find that the learned Judge held that the respondent No. 3/employee is able to establish his case and on the other hand the employer has failed to discharge its onus that the employee was working in managerial or supervisory capacity in the company. It has been decided that the employee is entitled to all reliefs claimed. He is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages and other consequential benefits from the date of termination.

( 3 ) THEREFORE, it is apparent that a preliminary issue arose as to whether the employee comes within the definition of workmen of the Industrial Disputes act, 1947 or whether he












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top