SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 423

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, JYOTESH BANERJEE
SUDARSHAN SHAW – Appellant
Versus
SUBHAS SHAW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JAYANTA MONDAL, TAPAS MANNA

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is at the instance of an applicant under section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and is directed against Order No. 22 dated 4th November, 2003 passed by the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Calcutta in Act 39 Case No. 103 of 2000 thereby holding that in the absence of death certificate of the deceased the proceedings under section 372 of the Act was not maintainable unless the applicant gets a declaration as to the death of deceased by filing separate proceedings in a Civil Court.

( 2 ) THE appellant herein filed the aforesaid proceedings under section 372 of the Act for grant of Succession Certificate for the purpose of receiving the debts and security of one Subhas Shaw, his father, who was. last seen on 2nd May, 1993 and was missing from his place of residence at 37d/2, Hari Ghosh Street, calcutta - 6 from that day.

( 3 ) IN the said application, it was alleged that from 2nd May, 1993 the said subhas Shaw was not traceable, as a result, the applicant made general diary in the Burtolla Police Station on 24th May, 1993 and also gave information to the Calcutta Doordarshan Kendra, Go






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top