SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 474

AMIT TALUKDAR, SANKAR PRASAD MITRA
JOYDEB PRADHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GORDHANDAS, S.N.S.ALQUADRI

Amit Talukdar, Sankar Prasad Mitra

( 1 ) AN otherwise innocuous application under section 439 of the Code of criminal Procedure (for short 'the said Code') which under ordinary circumstances could have been disposed of in the usual fashion, however, has hit the Hornet's nest and a situation has so bubbled up that not only the management of G. R. Case No. 159 of 2005 before the Court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Haldia suffers a jinxed deliberation but the same has a wider ramification which has to be addressed by the Court, keeping in mind the issue which has cropped up and covers several such situations that take place daily in the various Magistracies. Background:

( 2 ) A Division Bench of this Court in C. R. M. No. 3000 of 2005 on April 13, 2005 allowed the prayer of the petitioners in terms of section 438 of the said code who apprehended arrest in connection with Nandigram Police Station case No. 33/05 under sections 341, 448, 323, 325, 354, 308, 506 and 34. It was directed that the said order under section 438 of the said Code would remain operative for a period of two (2) weeks. Cause of Action:

( 3 ) EMBOLDENED with the said order in connection with C.













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top