BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, RAJENDRA NATH SINHA
SUKUMAR SAHA – Appellant
Versus
SHYAMAL KUMAR SAHA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS first appeal is at the instance of the defendant No. 1 in a suit for eviction and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30th September, 1993, passed by the learned Judge, 9th Bench, city Civil Court at Calcutta in Title Suit No. 2136 of 1982 thereby passing a decree for recovery of possession and mesne porfit at the rate of Re. 1 per day in favour of the plaintiff till the recovery of possession.
( 2 ) THE respondent No. 1 filed the aforesaid suit being Title Suit No. 2138 of 1982 in the City Civil Court at Calcutta thereby praying for recovery of possession of the suit property from the appellant herein and the case made out by the respondent No. 1 may be epitomised thus: (a) The suit property being premises No. 3/1/1c, Nanda Ram Sen Street belonged to the defendant Nos. 2 and 3 and one Aloke Ranjan Saha and in the year 1943, they let out the entire ground floor consisting of two rooms, kitchen, bathroom and privy with a porch and courtyard to one anil Kumar Saha at a rental of Rs. 28/- per month and such amount was subsequently increased to Rs. 35/- per month according to Bengali calendar. (b) In or about 1945, the said Anil Kumar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.