BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, RAJENDRA NATH SINHA
AYAN CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
FUTURE TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC – Respondent
( 1 ) ALL these three first miscellaneous appeals were taken up together as these are preferred against the self-same order being order dated 6th April, 2005 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 9th Court, Alipore in Title Suit No. 3 of 2005 thereby disposing of an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the plaintiff by directing the parties to maintain status quo over the suit property with a finding that the plaintiff is in possession of the same and that the defendant no. 2 failed to prove that he was in possession of the property in his personal capacity.
( 2 ) F. M. A. T. No. 1335 of 2005 has been filed by defendant No. 2, F. M. A. T. No. 1345 of 2005 has been preferred by defendant No. 1 and the plaintiff has come up with a separate appeal being F. M. A. T. No. 1335 of 2005 against the said order.
( 3 ) THE plaintiff filed a suit in the 9th Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, alipore being Title Suit No. 3 of 2005 thereby praying for declaration that the plaintiff was a tenant under defendant No. 1 in respect of the suit property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant Nos.
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Sriman Narayan and Anr.
Indian Cable Company Ltd. vs. Sumitra Chakraborty
Luganda vs. Servce Hotels Ltd.
Metro Marins and Anr. vs. Bonus Watch Co. Ltd. and Ors.
Rome Gowda vs. M. Varadappa Naidu and Anr.
Associated Hotels of India Ltd. vs. R. N. Kapur
Dalpat Kumar and Anr. vs. Prahlad Singh and Ors.
Delta International Ltd. vs. Shyam Sunder Ganeriwalla and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.