SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 362

High Court Of Calcutta
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee
BABAJI AUTOMOTIVE - Appellant
Versus
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED - Respondent
C. O. 575 Of 2005
Decided On : 06/07/2005

Advocates Appeared:
DEBASIS KUNDU, JAYANTA NARAYAN MAHANTY, MANWANDRA SINGH YADAV

An arbitration agreement must be in writing, as required by section 7(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, it is not necessary that the agreement must be signed by both parties.

Headnote:

ARBITRATION - ARBITRATION AGREEMENT - SECTION 7 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 - Interpretation of section 7 - Whether an oral arbitration agreement is valid - Held, no - An arbitration agreement must be in writing - Sub-sections (4) and (5) of section 7 explain when an arbitration agreement is considered to be in writing - Written agreement means an agreement in which the terms agreed by the parties are reduced into writing - It is not necessary that the agreement must be signed by both parties.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner, a distributor of Servo Brand Lubricants of Indian Oil Corporation Limited, challenged the jurisdiction of the arbitrator appointed by the Corporation under the arbitration clause in the distributorship agreement, on the ground that there was no valid arbitration agreement between the parties.

Finding of the Court:

The arbitrator held that there was a valid arbitration agreement between the parties, and the petitioner's application challenging his jurisdiction was rejected.

Issues: Whether there was a valid arbitration agreement between the parties, as required under section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that an arbitration agreement must be in writing, as required by section 7(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Sub-sections (4) and (5) of section 7 explain when an arbitration agreement is considered to be in writing. Written agreement means an agreement in which the terms agreed by the parties are reduced into writing. It is, therefore, not necessary that the agreement must be signed by the both parties. In this case, the existence of a valid arbitration agreement can be spelt out from the conduct of the parties.

Final Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's application challenging the jurisdiction of the arbitrator.

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under article 227 of the Constitution of India against an order dated January 24, 2005 passed by the sole arbitrator. By the order impugned, the arbitrator held that he had jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner namely, Surujit Saha, the sole proprietor of Babaji automotive, was appointed as a distributor of Servo Brand Lubricants of Indian oil Corporation Limited. The parties have entered into an agreement and in terms of the agreements, the petitioner took delivery of such lubricants from indian Oil Corporation Limited. The petitioner used to take lubricants on credit facility. It is alleged that the banker of the petitioner dishonoured several cheques issued by the petitioner when Indian Oil Corporation Limited presented those cheques for encashment.

( 3 ) IT is alleged that the lube distributorship agreement contains an arbitration clause requiring the parties to refer their disputes and differences to the sole arbitration of the Director (Marketing) of Indian Oil Corporation limited, who may either himself act as the arbitrator or nominate some other officer of the said Corporation to Act as the arbitrator.

( 4 ) INVOKING the said arbitration clause, the said corporation referred the disputes and differences between the parties to the arbitration of the Director (Marketing) of the said corporation. The said Director nominated Subrata Ghosh, a Deputy General Manager of the said Corporation, as the sole arbitrator.

( 5 ) THE petitioner appears before the arbitrator and files an application under section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the jurisdiction of the arbitrator on the ground that there is no valid arbitration agreement between the parties. The petitioner, therefore, requests the arbitrator to rule on his jurisdiction and to drop the arbitral proceeding.

( 6 ) THE arbitrator by the order impugned dated January 24, 2005 rules that there is a valid arbitration agreement between the parties.

( 7 ) MR. Debasish Kundu, Id. advocate, appearing in support of this application, draws my attention to a copy of the lube distributorship agreement, annexed at page 32 to this application, and submits that the said document is not signed by both the parties, but is only signed by the present petitioner. He, also, draws my attention to the findings of the arbitrator that the document contains the signature only of the petitioner. Mr. Kundu relies upon sub-section (4) of section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and submits that as the document containing the alleged arbitration agreement is not signed by both the parties, there is no valid arbitration agreement empowering the arbitrator to enter upon the reference.

( 8 ) IN order to appreciate the points raised by Mr. Kundu, it ig necessary to note the provisions of section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which run as under: 'arbitration Agreement- (1) In this part, "arbitration agreement" means an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not. (2) An arbitration agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or in the form of a separate agreement. (3) An arbitration agreement shall be in writing. (4) An arbitration agreement is in writing if it is contained in- (a) a document signed by the parties, (b) an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunication which provide record of the agreement, or (c) an exchange of statements of claim and defence in which the existence of the agreement is alleged by one party and not denied by the other. (5) The reference in a contract to a document containing an arbitration clause constitutes an arbitration agreement if the contract is in writing and the reference is such a







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top