SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 312

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, V.S.SIRPURKAR
DIRECTOR OF SUPPLY AND DISPOSALS – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY SHREE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.LODHA, PRATAP CHATTERJI, Tapati Ghosh, UTPAL MAJUMDAR

V. S. SIRPURKAR, C. J.

( 1 ) BEING aggrieved by the order passed by learned Single Judge of this Court allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent herein, M/s. Vijay Shree Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'company' for short) the appellants come up before us by way of this appeal. The two appellants are the officers of Union of India and have filed this appeal on behalf of Union of India. By the instant judgment and orders, the learned Single Judge directed the appellants to make payment of the amount to the Company for supply of second batch of 390 bales allegedly supplied by it. It was further directed that in default of a payment, the appellants would pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Shortly stated the facts are as under:

( 2 ) THE Company, Vijay Shree Limited, referred to as 'company' herein, is a limited company and owned a jute mill. It is also a sick Company under the provisions of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 and at the relevant time, was running the jute mill on the basis of a scheme approved by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction. It received at order bearing No. S. O. 565 (E) dated 12. 6. 2000 to produce j






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top