SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 300

ALOKE CHAKRABARTI, S.P.TALUKDAR
RANJIT KUMAR BAG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BALAI CHANDRA ROY

S. P. TALUKDAR, J.

( 1 ) THE present case arises out of a reference under section 395 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code made by learned Additional District and sessions Judge-cum-Judge, Special Court, Tamluk, Purba Midnapore.

( 2 ) THE backdrop of the present reference may briefly be sated as follows: on the basis of written information given by the Superintendent of Moyna group Electric Supply on 27th January, 2004, police authority started a case under section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with section 379 of the Indian penal Code, being Sessions Case No. (E) 5 (2) 2004. It was alleged that on 21. 01. 2004, one Netai Maity was found tapping energy dishonestly from incoming terminal point of meter installed by the West Bengal State Electricity board in the premises of the said person. Police after completion of investigation submitted report under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate transferred the said case to the said Learned court of Special Judge as the former held that it had no jurisdiction to try the case under the Electricity Act, 2003.

( 3 ) LEARNED Special Judge while referring the matter under section 395













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top