DILIP KUMAR SETH, SOUMITRA PAL
HILLTOP HOLDINGS INDIA LTD – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA - II – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred against an order dated 28th July, 2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 446 of 2002 by the learned single Judge. In the writ petition, the initiation of the proceeding under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. 1961 in respect of an order contemplated under section 143 (1) was challenged on the ground that in respect of such an order, section 263 has no manner of application. " (1) The learned single Judge rejected the plea on the ground that if an improper assessment order has been made under section 143 (2), the revenue is lost and the State cannot prefer an appeal against such a decision. If despite mistake having been committed in exercising power under section 143 (2), the Assessing Officer does not exercise its power under section 154, no action in appeal can be taken against it. In order to save revenue from such an eventuality, the legislature has embodied section 263 in the Act, Such a case is definitely prejudicial to the revenue sufficient for invoking section 263 even in respect of an order passed under section 143 (1 ). "
( 2 ) BEFORE we proceed to deal with the matter and examine the law, we may remind ourselves that the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.